Want to supercharge your growth? Download our latest Innovation ebook >>

Three effective sales organization structures

Determine the design of your sales team

Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG.

The design of your sales organization structure is like the spine of your business — it supports everything you do, facilitates control, and optimizes the use of resources. Your choice plays a significant role in determining the capabilities of your sales team and how your resources will be distributed. That’s why choosing the proper structure requires careful deliberation, aligning seamlessly with your broader business objectives.

Another thing to note is that the world of sales isn’t a static environment. It’s a dynamic, ever-evolving landscape that mirrors the constant changes in customer behavior and market trends. Hence, what worked in the past may not be as effective today. Your sales strategies and methods need to adapt and respond in real time to these fluctuations.

As you reassess your strategic sales plan and set the stage for a sales transformation, it’s crucial to question whether you have the right sales team structure. Are the roles clearly defined? Are your sales reps fully equipped to meet customer needs effectively and efficiently? What do you need to provide them to make their jobs easier?

This article will delve into three proven sales team structures, weigh their pros and cons, and offer practical guidance to help you craft the best structure for your sales organization. It’ll also shed light on best practices for creating a robust structure and how to gauge success through reliable key performance indicators. By the end of this guide, you’ll better understand how to design a sales organization that not only meets your business goals but also adapts to the ever-changing customer landscape.

What is a Sales Organization Structure, and Why Does it Matter?

What is a Sales Organization Structure?

A sales organization structure is the way a company’s sales team is structured and organized, outlining roles, responsibilities, and relationships within the team. This structure often reflects the overall goals and objectives of the business, shaping the pathways through which these goals are achieved.

A well-designed sales organization structure is a roadmap to a company’s sales success, setting clear direction and benchmarks, nurturing team collaboration, and ensuring the smooth operation of the sales engine. By studying and implementing effective sales organization structures, businesses can navigate the intricate terrain of the market, drive their performance forward and achieve their ambitious sales goals.

It should be noted that sales organization models can differ from company to company, depending on factors such as business size, product or service complexity, and target audiences. Each company should tailor their sales team structure to match these elements so that they can better align their sales team’s efforts with business objectives.

Why Does a Sales Organization Structure Matter?

As said above, having a clear sales organization structure in place is crucial, as it influences how effectively the team can operate, strategize, and close deals.

Think about your sales team structure as the system that delineates the roles and responsibilities within your sales department. It maps out the reporting lines, hierarchies, and communication channels. This fundamental structure dictates the actions of the individual salesperson and, consequently, impacts your sales organization’s collective performance.

By establishing a clear and effective sales team structure, you ensure that each sales team member understands their role. They’ll have more clarity about the territory, product, or customer segment they’re responsible for, leading to increased productivity and less overlap or redundancy. It can also prevent misunderstandings and miscommunications that could otherwise hinder the sales process.

The structure of your sales team also heavily influences that of your organization. An effectively structured sales team can streamline operations, increase efficiency, and drive revenue growth. It can enable the sales team to respond quickly to market changes, customer needs, and competitive pressures. Conversely, an inadequate structure can create confusion, inefficiencies, and missed opportunities.

In the hyper-competitive business world, understanding the crucial role of a well-defined sales team structure is a must. Remember that the structure isn’t just a skeleton; it’s the backbone of your sales success.

The Evolution of Sales Team Structure: Changes and Trends

The earliest sales teams were structured primarily around physical territories, with sales reps responsible for developing relationships and closing deals within their assigned geographic regions. However, as technology evolved and markets expanded, this model became less effective, requiring organizations to adapt their team structures accordingly.

One of the most significant sales organization trends today is the move toward a hybrid sales force. According to McKinsey, B2B customers now want more channels, greater convenience, and a more personalized experience from suppliers. In response, the hybrid sales force model orchestrates the customer journey across multiple touchpoints, utilizing a combination of channels. This model isn’t restricted to physical territory-based selling but includes remote selling and e-commerce, serving customers where they prefer to buy.

This transition from a traditional, geographical model to a more customer-centric hybrid model isn’t just a shift in sales strategy but also a fundamental change in the structure and roles within sales teams. In a hybrid model, sales roles are more specialized, and reps may be responsible for different stages in the sales process or different channels of customer engagement.

In parallel, we’re also seeing an increasingly prominent role for data within sales teams, marking another critical shift in sales team evolution. The modern sales rep is no longer just an agent selling a product; they need a wide range of skills, including the ability to work with data and derive insights. This requirement for data-driven sales roles reflects the importance of personalization and predictive selling in the modern sales environment.

For example, sales reps now use data to track sales data, identify customer behaviors, predict future trends, and tailor their sales approaches accordingly. They use sophisticated data analytics tools to gain insights that can inform strategic decision-making and provide a competitive edge.

However, even these transformations may not be enough to keep pace with the rapidly changing business landscape. According to Forrester, today’s sales organizational structure may not be suitable for the “next normal.” The economic impact of the pandemic has placed a heightened emphasis on nurturing relationships with existing customers and increasing product adoption and value realization. Before the pandemic, the primary focus of B2B sales organizations was landing new customers. Still, today’s challenged market environment underscores the importance of retention, expansion, upsell, and cross-sell strategies.

Indeed, Forrester data suggests that an estimated 77.6% of anticipated revenue will come from cross-selling, upselling, and renewing existing customers. This market reality demands that sales leaders reassess their sales structure, staffing, headcount, and budget allocation to align more closely with the changing buyer’s landscape.

All things considered, sales team evolution is an ongoing process dictated by market dynamics, technological advancements, and customer behaviors. As the world continues to change, so will the structure and management of sales teams. Having said that, with every shift, the goal remains consistent: to effectively serve customers and deliver values. It is, and always will be a customer-centric discipline.

3 Sales Team Structures for Building a High-Performing Sales Organization

The three most common sales team structures are the island sales structure, assembly line sales structure, and pod sales structure. Each of these models has its own strengths and weaknesses, with some being better suited for certain businesses than others. In this section, we’ll explore each of these structures in depth so that you can decide which one is right for your business.

1. Island Sales Structure: Pros, Cons, and Applicability

In an island sales structure, each sales rep is largely autonomous from other team members. They work independently from one another but are still part of a larger company. This model works well when multiple products or services are sold by different teams within a single company. It also allows sales leaders to leverage the unique strengths of individual reps to achieve more outstanding results overall.

For example, if you have someone who’s great at closing deals but not so good at prospecting new clients, they can focus on closing deals while someone else focuses on prospecting new leads instead (or vice versa).

Pros of Island Sales Structure

  • It enables you to nurture individual talent. By encouraging independence, salespeople can hone their unique selling styles and tactics, often leading to higher motivation and personal growth. Reps can also pursue innovative approaches to reach targets, contributing to an organization’s competitive advantage.
  • It simplifies the management process as it minimizes the need for coordination and collaboration among the team. Each sales rep is responsible for their own success, which often results in streamlined operations with less administrative overhead.

Cons of Island Sales Structure

  • It has an isolationist nature, which can foster a competitive rather than collaborative environment. The lack of interaction and communication may prevent reps from missing out on sharing crucial market insights, sales tactics, and client preferences.
  • It can lead to inconsistencies in customer interactions, as each rep might communicate different messages, potentially damaging the overall brand image. Also, less experienced sales reps may need more guidance and mentorship from more experienced peers.

Is the Island Sales Structure Right for Your Company?

Determining the island sales structure suitability for your company depends mainly on your business model and the nature of your sales team.

As said earlier, the island sales structure is best suited to organizations where sales reps have specialized knowledge or where the products or services being sold are distinct and require unique sales approaches. For instance, a company selling various products, each requiring specific expertise to sell effectively, may benefit from an island structure. Real estate firms and high-end luxury goods companies are typical examples where this structure thrives due to the highly individualized nature of each transaction.

Island sales structures can also be effective when your customers prefer to work with someone who knows them personally, and you can’t afford to hire many reps who can meet with customers regularly.

The island sales structure may not be right for your company if your customer base is spread out across multiple geographies or industries, making it difficult for one salesperson to cover all the bases.

2. Assembly Line Sales Structure: Pros, Cons, and Applicability

In the assembly line sales structure, each team member is allocated a specific task aligned with their skills, and the leads are passed down the line until the sale is closed. Imagine a car manufacturing assembly line, with each person responsible for a single part, and by the end, you have a complete car. This is how the assembly line sales structure operates.

A key performance indicator (KPI) in this structure could be the sales cycle length. As the team becomes more specialized, one would expect the sales cycle to shorten, increasing the lead-to-customer conversion rate. Customer retention rate is another KPI, as satisfied customers often equate to repeat business.

Pros of the Assembly Line Sales Team Structure

  • It helps promote specialization. Each team member focuses on one stage of the sale process, from prospecting to closing. As a result, each person develops expertise in their respective area, enhancing proficiency and efficiency over time.
  • It can be highly scalable. As the business grows, additional reps can easily be incorporated into the line. It allows for rapid adjustment of the team size and composition in response to business needs or market fluctuations.
  • It provides clarity. Everyone in the team knows their role, responsibilities, and the specific targets they must hit. This clarity can enhance motivation and productivity, making it easier to identify performance issues and areas for improvement.

Cons of the Assembly Line Sales Team Structure

  • It could lead to depersonalization. Since different stages of the sales process are handled by different people, customers might feel passed around, leading to a potential decrease in customer satisfaction and loyalty.
  • There could be communication breakdowns between stages. If the handoff from one stage to the next isn’t managed correctly, it can lead to miscommunication, delays, and even lost leads.
  • It requires a sizeable team. This model might not be ideal for a startup or small company with limited resources.

Is the Assembly Line Sales Structure Right for Your Company?

Similar to the island sales team structure, the suitability of the assembly line sales structure depends on your company’s size, goals, and the nature of your sales process.

If your company has a complex sales process that could benefit from specialization and you have a large enough team, then the assembly line structure might be a good fit. This structure could also be beneficial if your company is experiencing rapid growth and you need a scalable system to manage increased demand.

On the other hand, if your company values a personalized customer journey or if your team is small, a different structure might be more appropriate. Also, a company with a simple or short sales process might not benefit from breaking it down into separate stages.

3. Pod Sales Structure: Pros, Cons, and Applicability

Pods are the center of the pod sales structure. Think of a pod as a small, self-sufficient unit within a larger ecosystem. In the context of sales, a pod usually consists of sales reps, a team lead, or a manager and often includes members from complementary departments such as customer service, marketing, or technical support. Each pod operates as a mini-business, serving a specific market segment or customer demographic.

Pros of Pod Sales Structure

  • It focuses on teamwork and collaboration. By combining different roles within a single unit, a pod fosters a holistic approach to the sales process. Each member contributes their expertise to collectively achieve the sales target. This model encourages interdepartmental understanding and streamlines communication, leading to quicker decision-making and improved efficiency.
  • It can significantly enhance customer experience. Since a pod operates in a dedicated market or customer segment, it can tailor its efforts to the specific needs of its clientele. This degree of specialization leads to more targeted sales strategies and a deeper understanding of the customer, resulting in better customer satisfaction and retention.

Cons of Pod Sales Structure

Since the pod sales model highly depends on teamwork, any discord or friction within a pod can significantly impact performance. A successful pod structure requires a high level of compatibility among team members, which may be challenging to achieve in practice.

Moreover, while the structure promotes in-depth knowledge of a specific market segment, it can limit the breadth of understanding across different market demographics. Pods may become siloed, leading to a narrower view of the overall business landscape.

Is the Pod Sales Structure Right for Your Company?

Whether or not a pod sales structure is right for your company largely depends on your company’s size, market complexity, and organizational culture.

For smaller businesses or those with a narrow market focus, the traditional hierarchical structure may suffice. However, as your business grows and diversifies its market reach, the need for a more specialized approach increases. Here, the pod structure shines by providing dedicated attention to each market segment.

Cultural readiness is another critical consideration. The pod sales structure thrives in organizations that value collaboration, cross-functional understanding, and open communication. If these values align with your company culture, transitioning to a pod sales structure could be a strategic move.

Also, consider your customers. If providing a personalized customer experience is a priority, the pod sales structure’s specialization could be a significant asset.

How to Choose the Best Sales Organizational Structure for Your Business

The best sales team structure will depend on many factors, like your customer base, budget, culture, sales strategy, and organizational hierarchy. You’ll need to think about how those pieces fit together to find the right solution for your business.

Here are 7 factors that should be considered when selecting the best sales team structure for your company:

1. Customer: Who Are You Selling To?

The nature of your customer base should be the starting point for any sales structure decision. B2B sales generally require a different approach than B2C. Understanding who your customers are will help identify their needs, expectations, and purchasing behaviors, guiding your sales organizational structure.

For example, in an island sales structure, salespeople work independently, making this structure suitable for businesses that deal with a diverse range of customers. However, if your business model involves more complex sales processes or selling to large businesses or institutions, you may find the assembly line or pod sales structures more effective.

2. Budget: How Much Are You Willing to Spend?

Budgetary constraints will inevitably shape the sales organizational structure of your business. Large sales teams might provide comprehensive coverage but can also lead to higher costs. Meanwhile, small and lean teams can be more cost-effective but might lack the resources to scale rapidly.

Your budget should account for salaries, commissions, training, and the cost of sales tools and technologies. Remember that it’s not just about how much you spend but also about getting the best return on your investment.

An island structure may be more cost-effective since salespeople operate independently, reducing the need for extensive coordination or oversight. However, the assembly line and pod structures often necessitate more resources due to their emphasis on team collaboration and the need for multiple roles in the sales process.

3. Culture: What is Your Business Culture?

Culture shapes every aspect of your organization, and your sales team structure should reflect this. A sales-driven culture, for example, may lean towards a competitive, individual-oriented sales structure, while a collaborative culture might favor team-based structures.

An island structure suits competitive, individualistic cultures. Meanwhile, an assembly line structure creates a more disciplined and systematic culture. The pod structure cultivates collaboration and cohesion as teams work together to achieve shared goals.

4. Products and Services: What Do You Actually Sell?

The complexity and diversity of your offerings also affect the sales organizational structure.

An island structure is suitable for selling a single product or a narrow range of products. However, for a diverse product line or complex services that require different expertise at various stages of the sales process, an assembly line or pod sales structure would likely serve you better.

5. Sales Strategy: How Are You Selling?

Your sales strategy also influences your sales team structure. A business focusing on inbound sales might need a different structure than one concentrating on outbound sales. The sales cycle’s length, complexity, and the number of stakeholders involved should also be considered.

Ensure that your sales team structure aligns with your overall sales strategy, whether it’s solution selling, relationship selling, or consultative selling. This alignment ensures efficiency and consistency in your sales efforts.

For instance, if your sales strategy involves individual reps building personal relationships with customers, an island structure may be advantageous. For a more holistic approach, where everyone understands all aspects of the sales process, a pod structure is often best.

6. Organizational Hierarchy: How Do Your Sellers Fit into the Strategic Sales Plan?

A clear organizational hierarchy helps ensure everyone knows their role and responsibilities within the team, promoting accountability and efficiency. While a flat structure might work for small teams, a more hierarchical structure may be necessary as your business and sales team grow.

In an island structure, the hierarchy is simple, with salespeople reporting directly to a sales manager. Assembly line structures have a more complex hierarchy, with specialized roles at each stage of the sales process. The pod structure, meanwhile, decentralizes the hierarchy, with teams often self-managing within their pods.

7. Sales Process: How Do You Engage With Customers?

The way your sales team engages with customers should be another critical factor in deciding your sales organizational structure.

If your sales process is straightforward, an island or assembly line structure may suffice. However, if your sales process requires significant collaboration and communication among team members, a pod structure could be the right fit.

The Impact of Sales Organizational Structure on Your Business Growth

The sales organizational structure impacts multiple facets of the business — key among them being sales performance, customer satisfaction, and overall business growth.

An effectively structured sales team enhances sales performance. With clearly defined roles and responsibilities, each team member knows what’s expected of them, leading to increased productivity and efficiency. Additionally, a well-defined structure promotes accountability, leading to higher individual performance and collective team outcomes. On the other hand, an ill-defined or mismatched system could hinder performance, causing missed opportunities and a decline in revenues.

Customer satisfaction is another critical factor influenced by the sales organizational structure. A coherent and robust structure can facilitate quick decision-making and problem-solving, thus improving response times and customer service quality. It helps improve team communication and ensures a seamless customer experience, which can translate into higher customer loyalty. However, a chaotic or convoluted structure may lead to slower response times and inferior customer service, impacting customer satisfaction negatively.

Business growth is also intimately tied to the sales structure. An optimally structured sales team can scale operations, swiftly penetrate new markets, and adapt to evolving customer needs. It fosters a culture of agility and responsiveness, propelling your business to greater heights. Conversely, a rigid or fragmented sales structure can stifle innovation, deter scalability, and ultimately limit your business growth potential.

To summarize, your sales organizational structure directly influences your sales performance and customer satisfaction while steering the overall growth of your business. As such, take time to choose and develop the right structure for your team. In doing that, remember that it’s not an element to be set and forgotten; it’s a dynamic, vital part of your sales engine that requires regular analysis, adjustment, and innovation.

Core UX Writer at Booking.com

Lavender Nguyen is a Freelance Content Writer focusing on writing well-researched, data-driven content for B2B commerce, retail, marketing, and SaaS companies. Also known as an Email Marketing Specialist, she helps ecommerce B2C brands develop high-converting, customer-focused email strategies.